DOWNLOAD HERE IGNOU MEG-05 ASSIGNMENT 2023-24 AND ALSO check out IGNOU MEG-05 SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2023-24 GUIDELINES.  यहाँ MEG-05 ASSIGNMENT 2022-23 डाउनलोड करें और इसके अलावा IGNOU MEG-05 SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2023-24 की GUIDELINES भी देखें।

Assignments FOR JULY 2023 AND JAN 2024 ADMISSION


ASSIGNMENT IGNOU MEG-05 Solved Assignment 2023-24
SERVICE TYPE Solved Assignment (Soft Copy/PDF)
Programme: MEG-05/2023-24
Course Code MEG-05
SESSION July 2023- January 2024

30th OCTOBER 2024

Below are the details of the IGNOU MEG-05 SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2023-24:

  • Program: MEG-05
  • Course Code: MEG-05
  • Session: July 2023 – January 2024
  • Submission Dates:
    • Assignment 2023-24: Last date for submission – 30th April 2024
    • Assignment 2023-24: Last date for submission – 30th October 2024

Assignment Submission: Students are advised to submit the IGNOU MEG-05 SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2023-24 as per the specified schedule. The assignments must be submitted in soft copy/PDF format through the designated portal or email, as instructed by the university.

Guidelines for Preparing IGNOU MEG-05 SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2023-24: While preparing the IGNOU MEG-05 SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2023-24, students must adhere to the following guidelines:


1. Plato’s Exclusion of Artists from the Ideal State

Plato, the ancient Greek philosopher, expressed a rather controversial perspective on the role of artists in his ideal state as depicted in his works, particularly in “The Republic.” Plato’s rationale for excluding artists from his ideal state is rooted in his belief that art has the potential to disrupt the harmony and order he sought to establish within the society he envisioned.

Plato was deeply concerned with the moral and educational aspects of society. He believed that the state should be structured in a way that promotes virtue, justice, and the well-being of its citizens. To achieve this, Plato proposed a rigid hierarchy where individuals are assigned roles based on their natural abilities and virtues. In such a society, the rulers, or philosopher-kings, held the highest authority, as they possessed wisdom and knowledge essential for just governance.

Artists, according to Plato, were seen as creators of imitation – painters, poets, and playwrights – who produced works that imitated the material world. Plato was wary of the power of art to evoke emotions and its potential to distort reality. He argued that art could deceive individuals by portraying the world through mere appearances and arousing irrational emotions. He believed that this emotional manipulation could lead to a chaotic and irrational society, disrupting the harmony and order that the philosopher-kings were responsible for maintaining.

Furthermore, Plato’s concerns about art extended to its influence on the citizens’ moral and intellectual development. He feared that art, especially tragic drama and epic poetry, could magnify negative emotions and encourage undesirable behaviors. Instead of fostering virtue and promoting rational thinking, Plato believed that art could reinforce base instincts and weaken the citizens’ ability to distinguish between reality and illusion.

In addition, Plato emphasized the importance of education and the need for the state to control the messages that were being conveyed to its citizens. He was concerned that artists might convey ideas and values that contradicted the state’s principles, leading to moral confusion and dissent. Plato advocated for censorship of art, ensuring that only works aligning with the state’s approved values and virtues were allowed.

Plato’s vision of the ideal state prioritized reason, virtue, and harmony, and he believed that art, with its potential for emotional manipulation and distortion of reality, posed a threat to these core principles. While his views on excluding artists from the ideal state are critiqued for limiting artistic expression and creativity, they are indicative of his broader philosophical concerns about the role of art in shaping individual and societal values.

In conclusion, Plato’s exclusion of artists from the ideal state was driven by his concerns about art’s potential to disrupt the harmony, order, and moral development he sought to establish. His emphasis on reason, virtue, and control over the messages conveyed to citizens led him to view art as a potentially destabilizing force. While his stance may be seen as restrictive from a modern perspective, it reflects his deep-seated belief in the power of education, virtue, and rationality as the pillars of a just and harmonious society.

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. yashin says:

    Thnx for share.. Very best post. Ty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

error: Content is protected !!